Minimalist Syntax Exploring The Structure Of English: full version free software download11/30/2016 Jong- Bok Kim. Invited Talks. Kim, Jong- Bok. Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives on the Into Causative Construction: A Usage- Based Approach. Second Asia Pacific Corpus Linguistics Conference (APCLC 2. Mar 6- 9, 2. 01. 4, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Kim, Jong- Bok. Variations in the English Object Extraposition: Interactions between Constructions and the lexicon. Joint Conference LAK(Linguistic Association of Korea) & SMOG(The Society of Modern Grammar), May 2. Chosun University. Kim, Jong- Bok. 2. Linguistic Society of Korea Fall Conference. Kim, Jong- Bok. Using Online Corpora for Synchronic and Diachronic Studies. Winter Conference of the KASELL (The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguisitcs). Contact Information Address: Department of Language and Linguistics University of Essex Wivenhoe Park Colchester Essex, CO4 3SQ UK. Tel: (from within UK) 01206 872215 (from outside UK) +44 1206 872215. Fax: (from within UK. John Benjamins Publishing Company is an independent, family-owned academic publisher headquartered in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Founded over 50 years ago by John and Claire Benjamins, the company is currently under. Syntacticized Approaches. Early work took argument structure to be an independent level of linguistic representation, but its structure in many ways mirrored the syntactic configurations it was projected onto. In linguistics, branching refers to the shape of the parse trees that represent the structure of sentences. Assuming that the language is being written or transcribed from left to right, parse trees that grow down and to the. Christine Palumbo (Luis Moll and Christine Tardy, Advisors) Imagined Destinations: The Role of Subjectivity and the Generative Potential of Lived Experiences in Adult English Learners’ Paths to Fluency Summer 2015. In linguistics, the minimalist program (MP) is a major line of inquiry that has been developing inside generative grammar since the early 1990s, starting with a 1993 paper by Noam Chomsky. Chomsky presents MP as a program, not. Sungkyunkwan University. Dec 6, 2. 01. 4. 2. Kim, Jong- Bok. The Korean Sluicing: A Family of Constructions. The 1. 4th Korea- Japan Workshop on Linguistic and Language Processing, Mar 8- 9, 2. Pubblicazioni ordinate per anno Krapova, Iliana (In corso di stampa) Dizionario Hoepli Bulgaro, Hoepli (ISBN 9788820367664) (Altro) OJEDA CALVO M.D. Kyung- Hee University. Kim, Jong- Bok. Identity in Merger and Sprouting. Workshop on Sluicing and Related Phenomena, Nov 0. When Linguistics Meets Computer Science. Ellipsis in English Transparent Free Relatives? Workshop on Ellipsis, Dongkuk University, Dec 0. English Nominal Phrases: A Construction Grammar Approach. International Conference on Construction Grammar. Aug 1. 0, 2. 01. 2. Kim, Jong- Bok. The English Binominal NP: A Construction Based Perspective. ELSJ 5th International Spring Forum 2. Apr 2. 1- 2. 2, 2. Konan University, Japan. Kim, Jong- Bok. Asymmetries in Korean Cleft Constructions and Interactions with the Information- Structure, Feb 1. Dept. University of Hawaii. Kim, Jong- Bok. The English Binominal NP as a Nominal Juxtaposition Construction. On the Korean Inferential Construction. Workshop on Inferential Mechanisms and their linguistic manifestation and Kyung Hee Korea- Japan Workshop on Linguistics and language Processing. Dec 1. 2- 1. 3. Kim, Jongbok. English online corpora for the study of synchronic and diachronic English linguistics. ELSOK Fall Conference, Kyongwon Univ. Nov 2. 8, 2. 01. 0. Kim, Jongbok. What we L2 Learners can learn from corpora: focusing on English NP structures. Waseda University. Kim, Jongbok. Exploring English with Online corpora. English Linguistics Society of Korea. Using corpora in language Research and Learning. Minimalist program vs. Building a broad- coverage precision grammar for Korean. International conference. July 2. 7, Daegu Catholic University. Kim, Jong- Bok. Doing English Linguistics with syntactically parsed corpus and some applications. The English linguistics societyof Korea. Winter conference. An alternative to the Minimalist program. The Korean Society for Chomskyan Studies Winter conference. Feb 2. 5, 2. 00. 6. Kim, Jong- Bok. Case alternations and a computational implementation. Complex Predicates in Korean: From a Constraint- Based Perspective. The 4th Summer School on Generative Grammar, (. English Auxiliary Constructions and Related Phenomena. A Constructional Account of the Close Apposition in English. Purdue Linguistics Association(PLA) Symposium 2. Mar 2. 8- 2. 9, 2. Purdue University. Right Dislocation Construction in English: A Constraint- Based Approach. The 3. 0th Nortwest Linguistics Conference, Apr 2. Simon Fraser University. A Constructional Account of Right Dislocation in English. Outside the Clause: Form and function of Extra- clausal constituents, Jul 4- 5, 2. University of Vienna. English Transitive ING construction: A Usage- based Approach. The American Association for Corpus Linguistics (AACL 2. Jan 1. 8- 2. 0, 2. San Diego State University. Elliptical Constructions in Korean. East Asian Linguistics Seminar 2. Feb 2. 6, 2. 01. 3, University of Oxford. Structure and Evidence in Linguistics - A workshop in honor of Ivan A. Sag, April 2. 8- 3. Stanford University. Metaphorical Extensions of Eating and Drinking in English and Korean: A Usage- based Approach. Annual Conference of the Pacific Ancient and Modern Language Association (PAMLA 2. Nov 1- 3, 2. 01. 3, Bahia Resort Hotel, San Diego, USA. Form and Function Mismatch in the English Appositional Construction: A Construction- based Perspective. International Workshop on the Structure of the Noun Phrase in English: Synchronic and Diachronic Explorations (NP3 2. Nov 1. 4- 1. 5, 2. University of Leuven (KU LEUVEN), Belgium. What with Absolute Constructions: A Usage- based Approach. Question under Discussion and Reuse in Korean Sluicing. How Come and Why: Similarities and Differences. International Congress on English Grammar, Jan 1. Polytechnic University. Case Marking in Finnish Nonfinite Sentential Complements. The 1. 2th Korea- Japan Workshop on Linguistics and Language Processing, Mar 2. Kyung- Hee University. Kim, Jong- Bok. Transparent Free Relatives: Interactions between the Lexicon and Constructions. The 2. 01. 2 Northwest Linguistics Conference, Apr 7- 8, 2. University of Washington. Lee, Hyun- Woo, Seung. Han Lee and Jong. Bok Kim. Synchronic and Diachronic Uses of the English No Matter Construction. WECOL 2. 01. 1, Nov 1. Arizona University. Kim, Jong- Bok and Nam. Geun Lee. Lexical Aspect and Eventuality in Korean Imperfective Constructions. Oct 2. 7, 2. 01. 2 Workshop on the Representation of Time in Asian languages. Sincai, Taiwan. Park, Seul- Kee and Jong. Bok Kim. English Conditional Inversion: a Construction- Based Approach. Proceedings of the 5. Annual Conference of the International Linguistic Association. New York. Kim, Jong- Bok and Peter Sells. The English Binominal NP as a Nominal Juxtaposition Construction. Berkeley Linguistics Society, Feb, 2. Kim, Jong- Bok and Peter Sells. The English Binominal NP as a Nominal Juxtaposition Construction. Development of the Korean Resource Grammar: Towards Grammar Customization. The 8th Workshop on Asian Language Resources, Beijing, China. Kim, Jong- Bok and Peter Sells. A Phrasal and context- dependent analysis of Korean comparative constructions. The Sixth International Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics (TEAL- 6), AUg 1. Peking University, Beijing, China. Kim, Jong- Bok and Kyongseop Lee. So inversion in English. How big of a mess it is? Parsing Korean comparative constructions. Negative inversion in Standard and Non- Standard English: A constructional- based approach. Annual conference of the international linguistic association. State University of New York, New Paltz. Kim, Jungsoo and Jongbok Kim. English floating quantifiers: a non- movement approach. UBC, Vancouver Apr 2. Kim, Kyeong- min and Jongbok Kim. A functor treatment of 'such': a corpus- based approach. Interfaces and interactions in linguistic theories. Univ of Arizona, Tucson. Kim, Jinyoung and Jongbok Kim. English it is that construction: a corpus based approach. Interfaces and interactions in linguistic theories. Univ of Arizona, Tucson. Kim, Jong- Bok. The Big Mess Construction: Revisited. Berkeley Linguistic Society. Feb 1. 4- -1. 6, 2. Lee, Seung Han and Kim, Jongbok. Attracting negative inversion: syntactic or constructional force? Mid- America Linguistics Conference. Kim, jong- bok & peter sells. International workshop on the structure of the noun phrase in english. Oct 2- 3, 2. 00. 9. Kim, Jong- Bok. The inferenential it- is- that construction. On the treatment of discontinous modifier constructions. A Non- movement approach to Korean Numeral classifier constructions. Second International Conference on East Asian Linguistics. Nov 7- 9. Kim, Jong- Bok and Peter Sells. A constructional approach to multiple nominative constructions. Developments of construction grammar and its status quo. On the role of information structure with korean 'kes' LSA Winter Meeting. Hilton Chicago, Jan 5. Kim, Jong- Bok. Syntactically parsed english corpus ICE- GB and some applications. Workshop on hwo to do linguistics with corpus. Oct 2. 0, 2. 00. 7. Kim, Jong- Bok & Peter Sells. Korean cleft construtions and information strucutre. Workshop on Japanese/Korean semantics/pragamtics. JK 1. 7 Preconference workshop, UCLAKim, Jong- Bok and Jaehyung Yang. On the Syntax and Semantics of the Bound Noun Constructions: With a Computational Implementation. Paper to be presented at the 2. Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation. Seoul National University, Nov 1- 3. Kim, Jong- Bok and Peter Sells. Korean Nominalizer kes and Information Structure. Paper presented at the 1. ISOKL, Harvard University, August 3- -5, 2. Kim, Jong- Bok and Jaehyung Yang. Syntax and Semantics of Korean Numeral Classifier Constructions Paper presented at the 1. International Conference on Head- Driven Phrase Structure Grammar 2. July 2. 00. 7. Stanford University. Arto antilla and Jong- bok Kim. Structural Case on adverbials. Workshop on emprical approaches to morphological case. Stanford University. Kim, Jong- Bok and Peter Sells. Two Types of Multiple Nominative Construction: A Constructional Approach. Stanford University. Kim, Jong- Bok and Jaehyung Yang. Two types of multiple nominative construcdtiosn . Kyung Hee U. Kim, Jong- Bok. Subject- object and argument- adjunct asymmetries in English Wh- constructions. Minimalist Program vs. Constraint- Based Grammar. Invited Discussant. Kim, Jong- Bok. Constraint- Based Grammar Research Group. Nov 1. 1, 2. 00. 6. Kim, Jong- Bok. Parsing NPs in Korean: Focusing on Floating Quantifier Constructions. Cleft constructions in English and Korean. On the role of animacy and the participants in the eventuallity in case assignemtn in Korean. Sep 4, Daewoo Foundation. Three types of English cleft constructions: implications from corpus data. DELPH- IN: First Internatinal Working Meeting , University of Lisbon, Aug 2. Copy constructions and their interaciton with the copula in Korean. HPSG 2. 00. 5, Lisbon, Aug 2. Grammatical interactions in parsing Korean with the LKB system. Paclic 1. 8, Satellite Workshop. Dec 8, 2. 00. 4Capturing and parsing the mixed properties of light verb constructions in a typed feature structure grammar. PACLIC 1. 8, Dec 9 (Jong- Bok Kim, Jaehyung Yang, and Incheol Choi)English Expletive and Extraposition: A Constraint- Based, Non- derivational Approach. We will investigate language as it is used in our everyday lives, highlighting both the variability and systematic nature of all levels of linguistic structure. In doing so, we will discover how to approach language from a scientific perspective, learn the fundamentals of linguistic analysis, and understand the foundational concepts of the field of Linguistics. Sample topics to be explored across a variety of languages include language and advertising, language change, dialect variation, and language and technology. Why can we 'blacken' fish or 'whiten' teeth, but not 'pinken' or 'greenen' anything? Who makes up new words anyway? How do we put words together into meaningful sentences? And how do we understand the nuances of English without much direct instruction? While the focus of this course is on English grammar, we will also see that other languages possess grammars that are based on the same principles and constraints. Investigations in Acoustic Phonetics. Phonetic variation across accents of English; experimental design; practical experience examining accents of seminar participants; acoustic analysis of speech using Praat. As readers, we see words printed in different fonts, sizes, and typefaces, typically static on a page. As listeners, we hear a speech signal riddled with variation. We are exposed to words, but a single word is produced differently each time it is uttered. These words stream by listeners at a rate of about 5 syllables per second, further complicating the listeners' task. How listeners map a speech signal into meaning despite massive variation is an issue central to linguistic theory. The field of experimental phonetics investigates how listeners take words that often vary drastically and understand them as quickly and adeptly as they do. This class introduces students to acoustic and auditory phonetics. As a class, we will carry out a project in experimental phonetics aimed at understanding how different realizations of words are able to be understood by listeners. Throughout the course, students will read background literature, become familiar with the Stanford Linguistics Lab, and learn to use software integral to the design, data collection, and data analysis of experiments. Each week, we will have two meetings,one in a seminar setting and one in the lab. But is anything possible in a human language, and is there anything that is common to all languages? Looking past the vast surface differences, linguists have discovered deep commonalities among the languages of the world as well as strict limits on the observed variation and on what a possible human language is. In this seminar, we will seek to uncover the building blocks of language and the laws that govern their interactions. Our goal will be to reach an understanding of the ways in which languages are systematically alike and different, as well as of the nature of language in general. We will investigate a variety of topics, including crosslinguistic differences and similarities with respect to word order, the grammatical structure of questions, and how languages mark subjects and objects. We will explore the structure of both sentences and words, identifying and studying their fundamental properties. In this pursuit, we will rely on data from a range of languages, such as English, Navajo, Zulu, and many others. This seminar will teach you how to view language as an object of scientific study, introducing you to central concepts and methods of linguistics (with a particular emphasis on syntax) along the way. It will give you the tools to describe and analyze even unfamiliar languages, and will teach you to construct explicit hypotheses about how language works and to test them empirically. There are no prerequisites for this course and no experience with linguistics will be assumed; the course is Socratically taught and there will be no textbook. An overview of the interdisciplinary study of cognition, information, communication, and language, with an emphasis on foundational issues: What are minds? What are rationality and intelligence? Can we predict human behavior? Can computers be truly intelligent? How do people and technology interact, and how might they do so in the future? Lectures focus on how the methods of philosophy, mathematics, empirical research, and computational modeling are used to study minds and machines. Undergraduates considering a major in symbolic systems should take this course as early as possible in their program of study. Same as: PHIL 9. 9, PSYCH 3. SYMSYS 1. LINGUIST 3. Arabic language from historical, social, strategic, and linguistic perspectives. History of the Arabic language and the stability of classical Arabic over the last 1. Why the functionality of classical Arabic has not changed as Latin, Old English, and Middle English have. Social aspects of the Arabic language, Ferguson. The main varieties of Arabic, differences among them, and when and where they are spoken. Role of Arabic and culture in current world politics, culture, and economy. Linguistic properties of Arabic such as root- based morphology, lexical ambiguity, and syntactic structure relating it to current linguistic theories. Same as: LINGUIST 2. LINGUIST 4. 4N. The nature of bi- and multilingualism with emphasis on the social and educational effects in the U. S. The social, cognitive, psycholinguistic, and neurological consequences of bilingualism. Participation in planning and carrying out a research project in language use and bilingualism. Variation and change in languages from around the world; language and thought; variation in sound patterns and grammatical structures; linguistic and social structures of variation; how languages differ from one another and how issues in linguistics connect to other social and cultural issues; the systematic study of language. Words are the key to understanding the culture and ideas of a people, and by tracing the biographies of words we are able to discern how the world was, is, and might be perceived and described. We trace how words are formed, and how they change in pronunciation, spelling, meaning, and usage over time. How does a word get into the dictionary? What do words reveal about status, class, region, and race? How is the language of men and women critiqued differently within our society? How does slang evolve? How do languages become endangered or die, and what is lost when they do? We will visit the Facebook Content Strategy Team and learn more about the role words play in shaping our online experiences. Together, the class will collect Stanford language and redesign the digital dictionary of the future. Trigger Warning: Some of the subject matter of this course is sensitive and may cause offense. Please consider this prior to enrolling in the course. Same as: CSRE 5. 0Q, ENGLISH 5. Q, FEMGEN 5. 0Q, NATIVEAM 5. QLINGUIST 5. 2N. How language is used as a resource for performing and perceiving sexual identity. Drawing on linguistic analyses of pronunciation, word choice, and grammar, questions such as: Is there a gay accent? Why isn't there a lesbian accent? How do transgendered people modify their linguistic behavior when transitioning? How are unmarked (heterosexual) identities linguistically constructed? Sexuality as an issue of identity, as well as of desire. Iconic relations between elements of language such as breathy voice quality and high pitch, and aspects of desire such as arousal and excitement. How language encodes ideologies about sexuality; how language is used to talk about sexuality in public discourses about gay marriage and bullying, as well as in personal narratives of coming out. How language encodes dominant ideologies about sexuality, evident in labels for sexual minorities as well as terminology for sex acts. Discussions of readings, explorations of how sexuality is portrayed in popular media, and analyses of primary data. Final research paper on a topic of student choice. Same as: FEMGEN 5. NLINGUIST 5. 3N. They are the leaders in linguistic change, introducing innovations that eventually spread to the entire population. Not only do adolescents create new speech styles such as . This seminar will explore the diversity and creativity of adolescent language, and the role of adolescents in linguistic and social change. We will explore and analyze language play, genderspeak and teenspeak; peeving about usage; new and spreading usages. Two hundred years ago, the Muwekma language was one of a hundred languages that made California one of the most linguistically- diverse places on earth. Today, less than half of these languages survive but many California Indian communities are working hard to maintain and revitalize them. This is a familiar pattern globally: languages around the world are dying at such a rapid rate that the next century could see half of the world's 6. Focusing especially on California, this course seeks to find out how and why languages die; what is lost from a culture when that occurs; and how `sleeping. We will take a field trip to a Native American community in northern California to witness first- hand how one community is bringing back its traditional language, songs, dances, and story- telling. We will learn from visiting indigenous leaders and linguistic experts who will share their life, language, and culture with the class. Through weekly readings and discussion, we will investigate how languages can be maintained and revitalized by methods of community- and identity- building, language documentation and description, the use of innovative technologies, writing dictionaries and grammars for different audiences, language planning, and data creation, annotation, preservation, and dissemination. Finally, the course will examine ethical modes of fieldwork within endangered- language communities. Same as: ANTHRO 6. Q, NATIVEAM 6. 4QLINGUIST 6. Carolina Sea Islands (Gullah), in the Caribbean, and in W. The history of expressive uses of African American English (in soundin' and rappin'), and its educational implications.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |